Quantcast Trap Inspection

Share on Google+Share on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare on DiggShare on Stumble Upon
Custom Search

d) Equipment.  Proper equipment for inspection pays for itself in improved
ap uptime and savings in manpower.
(e) Establish Inspection Schedules. A balance between the cost of
inspection and potential savings in operational costs must be achieved.
( f ) Accurate Records.  Records that are easy to keep, which induce
accurate entries, and support the program are a must.
( g ) Improve Condition of the System. A longer range, but integral,
o b j e c t i v e in establishing a formal program is to bring the condition of the
steam traps to a level where inspection and maintenance are routine
money-makers rather than an uphill battle.
F o r a detailed description for implementing of each of the steps, refer to
Steam Trap User's Guide, UG-0005, April 1985, Naval Civil Engineering
Laboratory, Port Hueneme, CA.
2 TRAP INSPECTION.  The cost of steam lost through a leaking trap in one day
can exceed the cost of a new trap.  If a trap is not discharging condensate at
i t s designed rate, the reduction in efficiency of the steam-using equipment
can waste more money in one day than the cost of the trap. Good inspections
t h a t pinpoint problem traps for early repair or replacement are important.
W h i l e the trap is the focus of the inspection, external conditions of the
t r a p p i n g station should be inspected as well. Supports, bracing: insulation,
e x t e r n a l leaks, and corrosion should receive attention from the inspector
during each trap inspection.  The following paragraphs describe inspection
s c h e d u l e s , safety precautions, methods of inspection, trap failure,
t r o u b l e s h o o t i n g , and inspection reports and records.
2 . 1 Inspection Schedules.  The frequency of steam trap inspections should be
based upon the condition of the system, age of the traps, and percentage of
traps found to be faulty in a baseline survey.  A general guide for continuing
i n s p e c t i o n f r e q u e n c i e s after the baseline survey is as follows:
Trap Failure Rate
Inspection Frequency
over 10%
5- 10%
every 2 months
less than 5%
every 3 months
2.1.1 One manufacturer recommends inspection frequencies based on system
pressure as shown:
Inspection Frequency
0 - 30 psi
30 - 100'
100 - 250
Quarterly or monthly
o v e r 250
Monthly or weekly
2.1.2 More thorough but less frequent inspections are more effective than
frequent inspections of the same equipment.  The primary goal in scheduling
inspections is to achieve a balance between the cost of inspection and steam
loss and integrity of the system.  Exposed traps should be monitored daily


Privacy Statement - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc.