| Tweet |
Custom Search
|
|
|
||
 Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Remediation Survey
Air Sparging with Soil Vapor Extraction
Page 8
C.
Lessons Learned
1.
Lessons Learned about the Operation of the Equipment:
Reliable equipment
Low maintenance
2.
Why was the Technology Successful?
Favorable site conditions. Ongoing; but is improving soil and ground water quality.
3.
Why was the Technology Unsuccessful?
N/A
VI.
CONTRACT TYPE AND COSTS
A.
Design of System
1.
Contract Type:
Fixed price
2.
Cost:
$12,000
B.
Construction of System
1.
Contract Type:
Fixed price
2.
Cost:
~$110,000
C.
Operation of System
1.
Contract Type:
Time and materials
2.
Cost:
~$200,000
For period 11/936/96
|
 
|
|
|
||
