| Tweet |
Custom Search
|
|
|
||
 Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Remediation Survey
Air Sparging with Soil Vapor Extraction
Page 7
3.
Regulatory Provisions
a.
Permitting:
During operation, remained well below the limit of
0.6 lbs total VOC/hr.
b.
Monitoring:
At beginning, had to monitor monthly. Because of
good
remediation results, cut back to quarterly.
4.
Design Tools:
RSI S.A.V.E.TM II System
5.
Remediation Hardware:
6.
Capital Cost:
7.
Operating and Maintenance Cost:
V.
TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE
A.
Remediation Technology Choice
1.
Other Remediation Technologies Considered for this Site:
Pump and treat
2.
Why was Air Sparging with SVE Chosen over Other Technologies?
Chosen after extensive literature review and feasibility study.
Good for remediating vadose zone sands & groundwater plume.
Remediation Technologies used at this Site in addition to Air Sparging with SVE:
3.
Excavation/thermal remediation.
B.
Operation of Air Sparging with SVE
1.
Duration:
January 1994 - Early 1995 (projected)
2.
Other:
|
 
|
|
|
||
