| Tweet |
Custom Search
|
|
|
||
 M.4
BEST VALUE EVALUATION (SEP 1995)
**********************************************************************
NOTE: Insert a provision substantially similar to the following in
solicitations when "best value" is used. This provision can be
tailored to individual procurements. The Contracting Officer shall
identify evaluation factors in descending order of importance (or, if
of equal importance, shall state).
**********************************************************************
BEST VALUE EVALUATION
(a) The offeror's proposal shall be in the form prescribed by this
solicitation and shall contain a response to each of the areas
identified which affects the evaluation factors for award.
EVALUATION FACTORS
Responses to the Request for Proposal will be evaluated using the
following two principle factors: (1) PRICE and (2) TECHNICAL.
(1) TECHNICAL: The technical proposal will be evaluated to
determine whether the offeror possesses the capability required to
successfully perform the requirements of the solicitation. The
technical criteria are listed in descending order of importance (or
may be stated to be of equal importance):
_
(2) PRICE: The Price proposal will be evaluated to determine
reasonableness and realism of price. The cumulative rating of the
technical evaluation factors is equal to price.
M.5
LOW PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE EVALUATION (SEP 1995)
**********************************************************************
NOTE: Insert a provision substantially similar to the following in
solicitations when award will be based on low price/cost technically
acceptable award criteria. Tailor this provision for each
solicitation. The Contracting Officer shall identify these factors
below in descending order of importance (or are of equal importance).
**********************************************************************
|
 
|
|
|
||
