Custom Search
|
|
|
||
 MIL-HDBK-1013/12
<1> Can Procedures be Changed?Consider changing security procedures to lower
attack level. Procedural changes could include guard routing, restricting
access, or moving critical assets. If procedures can be changed, proceed to
<2>. Otherwise, proceed to <4>.
<2> Change Procedures. Revise security procedures to allow lowering attack level.
Proceed to <3>.
<3> Lower Attack Level. Lower the attack level affected by the change in
procedure. This structure completes the new requirement procedure. Return to
Figure 5.
<4> Can Window be Eliminated? Consider eliminating the window to do away with the
need for security glazing systems. If the window is not needed and can be
eliminated, proceed to <5>. Otherwise, proceed to <7>.
<5> Eliminate Window. Remove window from facility design and stop selection
process for this window. Return to igure 5.
F
<6> Can Site Layout be Changed? Consider changing the site or facility layout to
reduce attack level or eliminate attack tactic. If the site layout can be
changed, proceed to <7>. Otherwise, proceed to <9>.
<7> Change Site Layout. Revise site or facility layout to lower attack level or
eliminate attack tactic. Proceed to <8>.
<8> Lower Attack Level. Lower the attack level affected by the change in site
layout. This structure completes the new requirement procedure. Return to
Figure 5
.
<9> Lower Attack Level. The only remaining option is to lower the attack level to
a point that a glazing system can meet a set of specifications and
requirements. Lower the attack level one level. Proceed to <10>.
<10>Accept Increased Risk. Arbitrarily lowering an attack level increases the risk
that a security glazing system will not provide the level of protection deemed
necessary during the planning phase. This increased risk must be recognized
and accepted. This structure completes the new requirement procedure. Return
to Figure 5.
Figure 15
Procedure Description: Requirements Revision Procedure
46
|
 
|
|
|
||
