Custom Search
|
|
|
||
 PACNAVACENGCOMINST 4335.2
20 FEB 1992
PACNAVFACENGCOM A-R Responsibility Technical and Legal Advisors
From :
Contracting Officer, A-E Contract N62742-YR-C-XXXX
To:
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Subj:
(a) NAVFAC P-68, Appendix J
Ref:
(1) Field Report
Encl:
(2) through ( ), each individually identified evidential document
1. Pursuant to reference (a), we have reviewed enclosures (1) through ( ) for
possible Architect-Engineer (A-E) financial responsibility. {We were also
regarding possible A-E
briefed by representative(s) from Code(s)
financial responsibility.} Based on this review, we recommend that the
Contracting Officer make the following findings:
There is no A-R financial responsibility.
()
There is no A-E financial responsibility. The Government would have
()
incurred the additional construction cost if included in the initial
design and there was no other significant damages to the Government
involved.
There is A-E financial responsibility. Even though the design
()
deficiency did not result in construction cost above those which
would have been incurred if the initial design had been correct, the
Government has incurred significant administrative cost in
processing the action. The cost is quantifiable and action to
recover should be initiated.
There is A-E financial responsibility; however, the costs are
()
considered non-recoverable.
There is A-E financial responsibility and the costs are considered
()
recoverable. Action to recover should be initiated.
There is A-S financial responsibility and the costs are considered
()
recoverable; however, recovery is not in the best interest of the
Government.
2. (Support the recommendation provided in paragraph 1 with a detailed
statement explaining the reason(s) for the recommendation.)
Enclosure
|
 
|
|
|
||
