Custom Search
|
|
|
||
 MIL-HDBK-1013/12
3
Do Identification of Likely Aggressors
Threat
<2>
procedure
4
Is asset primary? Yes
Identification
Figure D-10
<1>
5
Identify likely aggressors, use Figure D-
of Likely
<2>
11. See Figure E-2.
Aggressors
6
Do Likelihood of Aggression procedure
Design Basis
Figure D-9
<1>
Threat
7
For unsophisticated criminals:
Likelihood of
Figure D-12
<1>
8
Determine asset profile, use Table D-14
Aggression
<2>
and "very low visibility": enter 1.
9
Determine level of usefulness, use
<3>
Figure D-13 and $60,000: enter 4.
<4>
10
Evaluate asset availability, use Table D-
18 and "limited availability on
installation, but is not available off
installation": enter 4.
11
Evaluate local incidents in past, use
<5>
Table D-19, and "no incidents": enter 1.
12
Evaluate nearby incidents in past, use
<6>
Table D-20 and "no incidents": enter 1.
13
Determine potential for future incidents,
<7>
use Table D-21 and "unlikely possibility":
enter 1.
14
Determine asset accessibility, use Table
<8>
D-25 and "asset is located within one
protective layer with on-site guard":
enter 6.
<9>
15
Evaluate effectiveness of law
enforcement, use
Table D-27 and "moderately effective":
enter 6.
16
Evaluate deterrence, use Table D-28
<10>
and "low possibility of success": enter 4.
Compute likelihood rating, use Table D-
17
<11>
29. Factors add up to 30. For 30, the
likelihood rating is medium. Enter M.
18
Repeat actions 2 through 17 for all remaining aggressors: sophisticated criminals,
organized criminal groups, and saboteurs
Table E-4
Actions for Example Number 2, Continued
Action
Action
Procedure
Figure Number
Structure
Number
Number
19
Do Applicable Tactics and Severity
Design Basis
Figure D-9
<4>
Levels procedure
Threat
20
Create tactic and threat severity level
Applicable
Figure D-14
<1>
worksheet for asset. See Figure E-7.
Tactics
239
|
 
|
|
|
||
